Main Article Content
Abdellaoui, B. M, Bleichrodt, H. and Paraschiv, C. (2007)” Loss Aversion Under
Prospect Theory: A Parameter-Free Measurement”. Management Science, 1659-1674.
Battalion, R.C, Kagel, J.C. Jiranyakul.K. (1990). “Testing Between Alternative Models of Choice Under Uncertainty: Some Initial Results,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 3: 25-50.
Cain, M., D. Law and D.A. Peel (2003) ‘The Favourite-Longshot bias and the Gabriel and Marsden Anomaly: An Explanation Based on Utility Theory’, in L. Vaughan Williams (ed.), The Economics of Gambling (London: Routledge) pp. 2- 13
Cain, M., Law. D and Peel, D.A. (2008)” "Bounded cumulative prospect theory: some implications for gambling outcomes," Applied Economics. 40(1), 5-15
Camerer, C.F. (2000) Prospect Theory in the Wild: Evidence from the field. D. Kahneman, A, Tversky Eds. Choices, Values and Frames. Cambridge University Press, New York, 288-300.
Cain, M., Law. D and Peel, D.A. (2002).” Skewness as an explanation of gambling by locally risk averse agents.”. Applied Economics Letters,15,1025-1028.
Friedman, M. and Savage, L.J. (1948), “The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk,” Journal of Political Economy, LV1, 279-304.
Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 2, 263-91.
Markowitz, H. (1952) “The Utility of Wealth”. The Journal of Political Economy, 60, 151-158.
Paya, I.A. Peel. D.A. Law, D. and Peirson, J. (2005) Testing for Market Efficiency in Gambling Markets: Some observations and New Statistical Tests based on Bootstrap Method.pp346-365. (In Information Efficiency in Financial and betting Markets (ed. L.Vaughan Williams. Cambridge University Press.
Peel, D.A. and Law, D. (2008) “A More General Non-Expected Utility Model as an Explanation of Gambling Outcomes for Individuals and Markets* Forthcoming Economica
Peel, D.A., Zhang, J. and Law, D. (2008). "The Markowitz model of utility supplemented with a small degree of probability distortion as an explanation of outcomes of Allais experiments over large and small payoffs and gambling on unlikely Outcomes " Applied Economics, vol. 40(1), 17-26.
Prelec, D. (1998), “The Probability Weighting Function,” Econometrica, 66, 497-527.
Prelec, D. (2000), “Compound Invariant Weighting Functions in Prospect Theory”, pp. 67-92 in Choices, Values, and Frames, (eds.) Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky , Cambridge University Press
Quiggin, J. (1991), 'On the optimal design of lotteries', Economica 58(1), 1-16.
Rabin, M (2000), "Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem", Econometrica, 68, 5, 1281-1292.
Rieger, M, O and Wang, M (2006) “Cumulative Prospect Theory and the St. Petersburg paradox”. Economic Theory, 28.665-679.
Saha, A. (1993), “Expo-Power Utility: A Flexible Form for Absolute and
Relative Risk Aversion,” American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (75), 905–913.
Samuelson, P.A. (1963), "Risk and Uncertainty: A Fallacy of Large Numbers", Scientia, 153-158.
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1992), “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty,” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5:4, 297-323.
Vaughan Williams, L. (1999), “Information Efficiency in Betting Markets: a Survey”', Bulletin of Economic Research, 53, 1-30.