UNFAIR GAMES, SUBJECTIVE PROBABILITIES, AND FAVOURITE-LONGSHOT BIAS IN FINNISH HORSE RACING

Authors

  • Niko Suhonen Department of Law University of Eastern Finland
  • Mikael Linden University of Eastern Finland

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v4i2.555

Keywords:

Risk, favourite-longshot bias, subjective probability, attractiveness of risk

Abstract

This paper discusses risky and uncertain decision-making in the framework of gambling. The well-known anomaly of favourite-longshot bias is considered. We argue that gambling behaviour can be seen as consumption. Thus, gambling behaviour is more than a risky choice. It is reasonable to assume that the price of gambling is the take-out rate or the expected loss. We illustrate, with some elementary gambling, that the gambling markets constitute an environment where risky choices can be measured only with probabilities. Typical gambling behaviour (e.g. horse betting) is modelled by an approach that includes the attractiveness of risk, subjective probability, and the utility of money. We tested the favourite-longshot bias with a large accumulated dataset from Finnish horse race tracks that monitored more than 27,000 races over a five-year period. The empirical results indicate that Finnish gamblers’ behaviour is biased: they gamble too little on favourites and too much on longshots. Our results confirm the universality of the favourite-longshot bias that can be found in Western Europe, Australia and the USA.

References

M M Ali `Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors` Journal of Political Economy (1977) 85 803 – 15.

M Allais `Le Comportement de l’Homme Rationnel devant le Risque: Criticue des Postulats et Axiomes de l’Ecole Americaine` Econometrica (1953) 21 503 – 546.

P Asch and R E Quandt `Risk Love` Journal of Economic Education (1990) 21 422 – 425.

K Busche and C D Hall `An exception to the Risk Preference Anomaly` Journal of Business (1988) 61 337 – 346.

C T Clotfelter and P J Cook `The “Gambler’s Fallacy” in Lottery Play` Management Science (1993) 39 1521 – 25.

L Coleman `New Light on the Longshot Bias` Applied Economics (2004) 36 315 – 326.

J Conlisk `The Utility of Gambling` Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (1993) 6 255 – 75

R Croson and J Sundali `The Gambler’s Fallacy and Hot Hand: Empirical Data from Casinos` The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (2005) 30 195 – 209.

E Diecidue U Schmidt and P P Wakker `The Utility on Gambling Reconsidered` The Journal on Risk and Uncertainty (2004) 29 241 – 259.

P C Fishburn `A Simple Model for the Utility of Gambling` Psychometrica (1980) 45 435 – 448.

M Friedman and L J Savage `The utility analysis of choices involving risks` Journal of Political Economy (1948) 56 279 – 304.

T Gilovich R Vallone and A Tversky `The Hot Hand in Basketball: On the Misperception of Random Sequences` Cognitive Psychology (1985) 17 295-314.

R Gonzalez and G Wu `On the Shape of the Probability Weighting Function` Cognitive Psychology (1999) 38 129 – 166.

R M Griffith `Odds Adjustment by American Horse-Race Bettors` American Journal of Psychology (1949) 62 290 – 294.

D B Hausch W T Ziemba and M Rubinstein `Efficiency in the Market for Racetrack Betting` Management Science (1981) 27 1435 – 1452.

B Jullien and B Salanié `Empirical Evidence on the Preferences of Racetrack Bettors` in D Hausch and W Ziemba (ed.) Efficiency of Sports and Lottery Markets (Amsterdam, Elsevier B.V. 2008) p 27.

B Jullien and B Salanié `Estimating Preferences Under Risk: The Case on Racetrack Bettors` Journal of Political Economy (2000) 108 503 – 530.

D Kahneman and A Tversky `Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk` Econometrica (1979) 47 263 – 291.

D Kahneman and A Tversky `Cumulative Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Uncertainty` Journal of Risk and Uncertainty (1992) 5 297 – 323.

A J Kanto G Rosenqvist and A Suvas `On Utility Function Estimation of Racetrack Bettors` Journal of Economic Psychology (1992) 13 491– 498.

P K Lattimore J R Baker and A D Witte `The Influence of Probability on Risky Choice: A Parametric Examination` Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization (1992) 17 377 – 400.

W H McGlothlin `Stability of choices among uncertain alternatives` American Journal of Psychology (1956) 69 604 – 615.

H S Shin `Optimal Odds Against Insider Traders` Economic Journal (1991) 101 1179 – 1185.

H S Shin `Prices of State-Contingent Claims with Insider Traders, and the Favorite-Longshot Bias` Economic Journal (1992) 102 426 – 435.

H S Shin `Measuring the Incidence of Insider Trading in a Market for State-Contingent Claims` Economic Journal (1993) 103 1141 – 1153.

C Starmer `Developments in Non-Expected Utility Theory: The Hunt for a Descriptive Theory of Choice under Risk` Journal of Economic Literature (2000) 38 332 – 382.

Suomen Hippos (2007) http://www.hippos.fi/hippos/tulokset/ (Read 17.8.2007).

J von Neumann and O Morgenstern The Theory of Games and Economic Behaviour (1944) Princeton University Press, Princeton.

A P Weinbach and P J Rodney `The Link Between Information and the Favorite-longshot Bias in Pari-mutuel Wagering Markets` The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics (2008) 130-44.

M Weiztman `Utility Analysis and Group Behavior: An Empirical Study` Journal of Political Economy (1965) 73 18 – 26.

S Winter and M Kukuk `Risk Love and the Favorite-Longshot Bias: Evidence from German Harness Horse Racing` Schmalenbach Business Review (2006) 58 349 – 364.

M Yaari `The Dual Theory of Choice under Risk` Econometrica (1987) 55 95 – 115

Published

2013-01-02

Issue

Section

Articles