OVER-VALUED AND UNDER-DOGGED: AN ASSESSMENT OF THE SEEDING OF MID-MAJOR TEAMS IN THE NCAA MEN’S BASKETBALL TOURNAMENT

Authors

  • Jim Lackritz Management Information Systems, College of Business Administration, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182-8230
  • Bruce A. Reinig A. Reinig
  • Ira Horowitz

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5750/jgbe.v7i1.626

Keywords:

NCAA Basketball Tournament, Selection Committee Seeds, Betting Lines, Final Spreads, Conference Affiliations.

Abstract

We test whether the NCAA Selection Committee’s tournament seeding process is biased with respect to teams from the Mid-Major conferences, by analyzing Seeds, Spreads,  Betting Lines, and the participants’ conference affiliations for the 819 games of the 13 NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournaments played from 2000 to 2012. We demonstrate that the Selection Committee overvalues Mid-Major teams that receive a favorable seed and undervalues those that receive unfavorable seeds. Because Mid-Major teams receive more unfavorable seeds than favorable ones, by a nearly two-to-one ratio, the net results are to the detriment of the Mid-Major conferences. We show that the betting market appears to acknowledge the Selection Committee’s bias and makes adjustments. 

References

B P Carlin ‘Improved NCAA Basketball Tournament Modeling via Point Spread and Team Strength Information’ The American Statistician (1996) 50(1) 39-43.

B J Coleman and A K Lynch ‘Identifying the NCAA Tournament ‘Dance Card’’ Interfaces (2001) 31(3) 76-86.

B J Coleman, J M DuMond, and A K Lynch ‘Evidence of Bias in NCAA Tournament Selection and Seeding’ Managerial and Decision Economics (2010) 31(7) 431-452.

Bloomberg, ‘March Madness Gambling Brings Out Warnings From NCAA to Tournament Players’ URL: http://www.bloomberg.com, accessed on August 3, 2012.

J Coleman and A K Lynch ‘NCAA Tournament Games: The Real Nitty-Gritty’ Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (2009) 5(3) 1-25.

I Horowitz ‘Seeds, Spreads, and Synchronicity in the Big Dance Betting Market’ International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences (2010) 3(1) 1-14.

S H Jacobson and D M King ‘Seeding in the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament: When is a Higher Seed Better?’ The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics (2009) 3(2) 63-87.

S H Jacobson, A G Nikolaev, D M King, and A J Lee ‘Seed Distributions for the NCAA Men’s Basketball Tournament’ Omega (2011) 39(6) 719-724.

T L Morris and F H Bokari ‘The Dreaded Middle Seeds – Are They the Worst Seeds in The NCAA Basketball Tournament?” Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports (2012) 8(3) 1-13.

NCAA, ‘NCAA March Madness: Filling the Division I Basketball Brackets’ URL: www.ncaa.org,

accessed on July 23, 2012.

R J Paul and A P Weinbach ‘Market Efficiency and NCAA College Basketball Gambling Journal of Economics and Finance (2005) 29(3) 40-408.

T Smith and N C Schwertman ‘Can the NCAA Basketball Tournament Seeding be Used to Predict Margin of Victory?’ The American Statistician (1999) 53(2) 94-98

Published

2013-05-23

Issue

Section

Articles